Was the treatment because the claimant did a protected act? There is no requirement that the respondent be consciously motivated to treat the claimant less favourably. But the respondent
The definition of harassment is set out in s26 of the Equality Act 2010. Some relevant causes of actions.40 – harassment of employees and job applicants (which may include
Extension of time on just and equitable grounds The Law
Insults, breasts and bald decision?Harassment and sex in the employment tribunal Insitu Cleaning Co Limited v Mrs Heads [1995] IRLR, 4, EAT. (“Hiya, big tts”) British Bung and Mr
“All Reasonable Steps” defence against vicarious liability (section 109(4)) This is not the new third party sexual harassment provision (which currently involves “reasonable steps” and not “all reasonable steps”),
